Gliosarcoma Separates from Conventional Glioblastoma by a TP53/RB1-High, EGFR-Low Alteration Pattern Rather Than by Global Genomic Burden
Rare glioblastoma variants are usually treated as ordinary glioblastoma because prospective variant-specific cohorts are scarce. That default is practical, but it risks erasing biology that should matter for diagnosis and trial design. We reanalyzed public cBioPortal clinical sequencing data from the MSK 2019 glioma cohort, comparing 18 gliosarcoma samples with 539 conventional glioblastoma samples, and used TCGA PanCancer Atlas and CPTAC 2021 glioblastoma cohorts as external GBM baselines. Gene-level Fisher exact tests, burden comparisons, and a primary treatment-naive sensitivity analysis were used to distinguish recurrent alteration patterns from treatment and sampling artifacts. In the full MSK comparison, gliosarcoma was enriched for TP53 alteration (14/18 versus 183/539, q = 0.0067) and RB1 alteration (8/18 versus 78/539, q = 0.0258), and depleted for EGFR alteration (1/18 versus 219/539, q = 0.0258). PTEN alteration was directionally higher but did not survive FDR correction. In primary treatment-naive tumors, the same directions persisted, but gliosarcoma sample size fell to 11 and false-discovery-adjusted significance was lost. Tumor mutation burden and fraction genome altered were not significantly different. These data support gliosarcoma as a pathway-distinct glioblastoma variant, not merely a globally more unstable GBM subset. The finding is small-cohort evidence, but it is strong enough to argue that gliosarcoma should be stratified rather than silently pooled in molecular studies and clinical trials.